3DMark releases XeSS benchmark replace
UL options, the corporate that develops the 3DMark benchmark, has launched a new function check (opens in new tab) for Intel’s XeSS AI-enhanced upscaling expertise. It is obtainable as a free obtain to homeowners of the Superior and Skilled editions, although provided that your version consists of the Port Royal improve.
The discharge of the check coincides with that of Intel’s Arc graphics playing cards. Do take a look at our Arc A770 evaluate (opens in new tab), although XeSS additionally works on newer Nvidia and AMD GPUs too. The check is predicated on the Port Royal benchmark. It is a very intensive sequence with a lot of ray traced results and reflective surfaces to point out off XeSS’ capabilities.
The benchmark runs twice, as soon as with XeSS disabled, after which with it enabled. Each FPS readings are displayed together with the share achieve. The second check choice known as XeSS Body Inspector, and it reveals 15 frames in complete. Then the consumer can zoom into any a part of the picture to guage XeSS’s picture high quality.
I ran the check on an RTX 3080 Ti system that included a Ryzen 9 7950X CPU (opens in new tab). With out XeSS it returned 59.44 FPS, whereas with XeSS on, the end result was 76.23. That is a pleasant 28.2% efficiency enchancment with no discernible picture high quality penalty. Nevertheless, working the DLSS 2.0 Characteristic Check leads to a greater than 100% enchancment, leaping from 62.18 FPS to 134.65.
To run the Intel XeSS function check, you want to have a GPU that helps Shader Mannequin 6.4 and Microsoft DirectX Raytracing Tier 1.1. XeSS-compatible GPUs embrace Intel Arc GPUs, in addition to AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce GPUs supporting the above tech. You additionally want Home windows 11 or Home windows 10 64-bit 20H2 or newer.
In the event you plan to purchase an Arc GPU, it is undoubtedly value enjoying round with XeSS to get higher efficiency or greater picture high quality (or each). It is also good to see Intel open the XeSS customary, although with every maker specializing in optimizing its personal upscaling implementation for its particular structure, sticking to your manufacturers’ tech looks like the most secure guess. For now, anyway.